Logic Journal of IGPL Advance Access originally published online on August 9, 2007
Logic Journal of IGPL 2007 15(4):313-320; doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzm022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Logic for Mathematical Writing
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. E-mail: edmund.harriss{at}mathematicians.org.uk
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK. E-mail: w.hodges{at}qmul.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
In the School of Mathematical Sciences at Queen Mary in the University of London we have been running a module that teaches the students to write good mathematical English. The module is for second-year undergraduates and has been running for three years. It is based on logic, but the logic—though mathematically precise—is informal and doesn't use logical symbols. Some theory of definitions is taught in order to give a structure for mathematical descriptions, and some natural deduction rules form a basis for writing mathematical arguments. Alongside this logical material, the students have weekly exercises that involve writing informal explanations of simple mathematical ideas for non-mathematicians.
Key Words: writing mathematical exposition logic informal logic definition discharging assumptions natural deduction Pascal
Received for publication 20 December 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?