Skip Navigation

Logic Journal of IGPL 1997 5(4):565-574; doi:10.1093/jigpal/5.4.565
© 1997 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jipsen, P
Right arrow Articles by Maddux, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nonrepresentable sequential algebras

P Jipsen and RD MadduxA1

Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, 7700 Rondebosch, South Africa. Email: pjipsen@maths.uct.ac.za A1 Department of Mathematics, 400 Carver Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-2066, USA. Email: maddux@iastate.edu

The sequential calculus of von Karger and Hoare is designed for reasoning about sequential phenomena, dynamic or temporal logic, and concurrent or reactive systems. Unlike the classical calculus of relations, it has no operation for forming the converse of a relation. Sequential algebras are algebras that satisfy certain equations in the sequential calculus. One standard example of a sequential algebra is the set of relations included in a partial ordering. Nonstandard examples arise by relativizing relations algebras to elements that are antisymmetric, transitive, and reflexive. The incompleteness and non-finite-axiomatizability of the sequential calculus are examined here from a relation-algebraic point of view. New constructions of nonrepresentable relation algebras are used to prove that there is no finite axiomatization of the equational theory of antisymmetric dense locally linear sequential algebras. The constructions improve on previous examples in certain interesting respects and give yet another proof that the classical calculus of relations is not finitely axiomatizable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.