Skip Navigation


Logic Journal of IGPL Advance Access originally published online on September 24, 2007
Logic Journal of IGPL 2007 15(5-6):621-636; doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzm042
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosado Haddock, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Why and How Platonism?

Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock

Department of Philosophy, University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras. E-mail: grosado{at}uprrp.edu

Probably the best arguments for Platonism are those directed against its rival philosophies of mathematics. Frege's arguments against formalism, Gödel's arguments against constructivism and those against the so-called syntactic view of mathematics, and an argument of Hodges against Putnam are expounded, as well as some arguments of the author. A more general criticism of Quine's views follows. The paper ends with some thoughts on mathematics as a sort of Platonism of structures, as conceived by Husserl and essentially endorsed by the author.

Key Words: Platonism • Mathematics • Logic • Gottlob Frege • Kurt Gödel • Hilary Putnam • W. V. O. Quine • Edmund Husserl.



References

  1. Abbot Stephen. Understanding Analysis (2001) New York et al.

  2. Alemán Anastasio. Lógica, Matemáticas y Realidad (2001) Madrid: Tecnos.

  3. Benacerraf Paul. "What numbers could not be" 1965. In: Philosophy of Mathematics (1983) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 403–420. reprinted in Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (eds.)

  4. Beth EW. The Foundations of Mathematics (1959) North Holland: Amsterdam. revised edition 1963.

  5. Bourbaki Nicholas. "Foundations of Mathematics for the Working Mathematician". Journal of Symbolic Logic (1949) 14((4)):1–8.[CrossRef]

  6. Bourbaki Nicholas. "The Architecture of Mathematics". American Mathematical Monthly (1950) 57:221–232.[CrossRef]

  7. Carnap Rudolf. Logische Syntax der Sprache 1934 (1937) English revised edition. London: Routledge. reprint, Chicago et al. Open Court, 2002.

  8. Curry Haskell B. An Outline of a Formalist Philosophy of Mathematics (1951) Amsterdam: North Holland.

  9. Duhem Pierre. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science—Agniew Roger, Baker Peter, eds. (1996) Hackett: Indianapolis.

  10. Field Hartry. Mathematics without Numbers (1980) Oxford: Blackwell.

  11. Field Hartry. Realism, Mathematics and Modality (1989) Oxford: Blackwell.

  12. Frege Gottlob. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1894—Thiel Christian, ed. (1986) centenary edition. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

  13. Frege Gottlob. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (1962) two vols. (I) 1893 and (II) 1903, reprint Hildesheim, Georg Olms.

  14. Frege Gottlob. Kleine Schriften—Angelleli I, ed. (1967, 1990) Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

  15. Gillies Donald. Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century (1993) Oxford: Blackwell.

  16. Gödel Kurt. "Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and its implications". In: Collected Works III—Gödel Kurt, ed. (1995) Oxford: Oxford University Press. 304–323. (version III) and pp. 356-362 (version V).

  17. Gödel Kurt. "Is mathematics syntax of language?" In: Collected Works III—Gödel Kurt, ed. (1995) Oxford: Oxford University Press. 334–356. (version III) and pp. 356-362 (version V).

  18. Hill Claire O., Rosado Haddock Guillermo E. Husserl or Frege?: Meaning, Objectivity and Mathematics (2000, 2003) Chicago et al.: Open Court.

  19. Hodges Wilfrid. "Elementary Logic". In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic I—Gabbay D, Guenthner F, eds. (1983) Dordrecht: Reidel. 1–131.

  20. Husserl Edmund. Logische Untersuchungen (1900-01) two vols. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. 1975 (I) and 1984 (II).

  21. Husserl Edmund. Formale und tranzendentale Logik,1929 (1974) Martinus Nijhoff: Den Haag.

  22. Husserl Edmund. Einführung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie (1984) Martinus Nijhoff: Den Haag.

  23. Husserl Edmund. Logik und allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie (1996) Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  24. Putnam Hilary. "Models and reality". Journal of Symbolic Logic (1980) 45:464–482.[CrossRef][ISI]

  25. Quine WO. From a Logical Point of View (1953) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  26. Quine WO. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (1969) New York: Columbia University Press.

  27. Rosado Haddock Guillermo E. Review of Anastasio Alemán. Lógica, Matemáticas y Realidad, Philosophia Mathematica (2003) 11/1:109–120.

  28. Wittgenstein Ludwig. German with English translation 1922 (1961) London: Routledge. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus(German originalLogisch-philosophische Abhandlung 1921).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosado Haddock, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?