Skip Navigation

Logic Journal of IGPL 2006 14(5):815-825; doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzl011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shamir, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Satisfiability Decay along Conjunctions of Pseudo-Random Clauses

Eli Shamir

Institute of Mathematics and School of Computer Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.


   Abstract

k-SAT is a fundamental constraint satisfaction problem. It involves S(m), the satisfaction set of the conjunction of m clauses, each clause a disjunction of k literals. The problem has many theoretical, algorithmic and practical aspects.

When the clauses are chosen at random it is anticipated (but not fully proven) that, as the density parameter m/n (n the number of variables) grows, the transition of S(m) to being empty, is abrupt: It has a "sharp threshold", with probability 1 – o(1).

In this article we replace the random ensemble analysis by a pseudo-random one: Derive the decay rule for individual sequences of clauses, subject to combinatorial conditions, which in turn hold with probability 1 – o(1).

This is carried out under the big relaxation that k is not constant but k = {gamma} log n , or even r log log n . Then the decay of S is slow, "near-perfect" (like a radioactive decay), which entails sharp thresholds for the transition-time of S below any given level, down to S = {emptyset}.

Key Words: Constraint satisfaction • k-SAT • sharp thresholds • pseudorandom analysis • unique k-SAT representations • learning from examples


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.