<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Logic Journal of IGPL - recent issues</title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Logic Journal of IGPL - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1368-9894</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Logic Journal of IGPL</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1367-0751</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/231?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/43?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/373?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/401?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/503?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/535?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/577?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/621?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/637?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/689?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/707?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/759?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/801?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Logics with the Qualitative Probability Operator]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The paper presents several strongly complete axiomatizations of qualitative probability within the framework of probabilistic logic. We show that in the proposed semantics qualitative probabilities are characterized by probability functions, so they also are comparative probabilities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ognjanovic, Z., Perovic, A., Raskovic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Logics with the Qualitative Probability Operator]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heterogeneous Fibring of Deductive Systems Via Abstract Proof Systems]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Fibring is a meta-logical constructor that applied to two logics produces a new logic whose formulas allow the mixing of symbols. Homogeneous fibring assumes that the original logics are presented in the same way (e.g via Hilbert calculi). Heterogeneous fibring, allowing the original logics to have different presentations (e.g. one presented by a Hilbert calculus and the other by a sequent calculus), has been an open problem. Herein, consequence systems are shown to be a good solution for heterogeneous fibring when one of the logics is presented in a semantic way and the other by a calculus and also a solution for the heterogeneous fibring of calculi. The new notion of abstract proof system is shown to provide a better solution to heterogeneous fibring of calculi namely because derivations in the fibring keep the constructive nature of derivations in the original logics. Preservation of compactness and semi-decidability is investigated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cruz-Filipe, L., Sernadas, A., Sernadas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heterogeneous Fibring of Deductive Systems Via Abstract Proof Systems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sequent Calculi for Some Strict Implication Logics]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We introduce various sequent systems for propositional logics having strict implication, and prove the completeness theorems and the finite model properties of these systems.The cut-elimination theorems or the (modified) subformula properties are proved semantically.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ishigaki, R., Kashima, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sequent Calculi for Some Strict Implication Logics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Constructing Finite Least Kripke Models for Positive Logic Programs in Serial Regular Grammar Logics]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A serial context-free grammar logic is a normal multimodal logic <I>L</I> characterized by the seriality axioms and a set of inclusion axioms of the form <SUB><I>t</I></SUB>-&gt;<SUB><I>s</I><SUB>1</SUB></SUB>...<SUB><I>s</I><SUB>k</SUB></SUB>. Such an inclusion axiom corresponds to the grammar rule <I>t</I> -&gt; <I>s</I><SUB>1</SUB>... <I>s</I><SUB>k</SUB>. Thus the inclusion axioms of <I>L</I> capture a context-free grammar <f>$$\mathcal{G}(L)$$</f>. If for every modal index <I>t</I>, the set of words derivable from <I>t</I> using <f>$$\mathcal{G}(L)$$</f> is a regular language, then <I>L</I> is a serial regular grammar logic.</p>
<p>In this paper, we present an algorithm that, given a positive multimodal logic program <I>P</I> and a set of finite automata specifying a serial regular grammar logic <I>L</I>, constructs a finite least <I>L</I>-model of <I>P</I>. (A model <I>M</I> is less than or equal to model <I>M</I>' if for every positive formula , if <I>M</I>   then <I>M</I>'  .) A least <I>L</I>-model <I>M</I> of <I>P</I> has the property that for every positive formula , <I>P</I>   iff <I>M</I>  . The algorithm runs in exponential time and returns a model with size 2<sup><I>O</I></sup>(<I>n</I><sup>3</sup>). We give examples of <I>P</I> and <I>L</I>, for both of the case when <I>L</I> is fixed or <I>P</I> is fixed, such that every finite least <I>L</I>-model of <I>P</I> must have size 2<sup>(<I>n</I>)</sup>. We also prove that if <I>G</I> is a context-free grammar and <I>L</I> is the serial grammar logic corresponding to <I>G</I> then there exists a finite least <I>L</I>-model of <SUB>s</SUB> p iff the set of words derivable from <I>s</I> using <I>G</I> is a regular language.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Constructing Finite Least Kripke Models for Positive Logic Programs in Serial Regular Grammar Logics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Ignorance and Contradiction Considered as Truth-Values]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A critical view of the alleged significance of Belnap four-valued logic for reasoning under inconsistent and incomplete information is provided. The difficulty lies in the confusion between truth-values and information states, when reasoning about Boolean propositions. So our critique is along the lines of previous debates on the relevance of many-valued logics and especially of the extension of the Boolean truth-tables to more than two values as a tool for reasoning about uncertainty. The critique also questions the significance of partial logic.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dubois, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Ignorance and Contradiction Considered as Truth-Values]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conferences]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conferences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Conferences</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/231?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/2/231?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzn005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Acknowledgements</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Introduction to Basic Arithmetic]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We study Basic Arithmetic <b>BA</b>, which is the basic logic <b>BQC</b> equivalent of Heyting Arithmetic <b>HA</b> over intuitionistic logic <b>IQC</b>, and of Peano Arithmetic <b>PA</b> over classical logic <b>CQC</b>. It turns out that The Friedman translation is applicable to <b>BA</b>. Using this translation, we prove that <b>BA</b> is closed under a restricted form of the Markov rule. Moreover, it is proved that all nodes of a finite Kripke model of <b>BA</b> are classical models of <f>$${I\exists }_{1}^{+}$$</f>, a fragment of <b>PA</b> with Induction restricted to the formulas made up of ,  and/or . We also study an interesting extension of <b>BQC</b>, called <b>EBQC</b>, which is the extension by the axiom schema  -&gt;   . We show that this extension behaves very like to <b>IQC</b>, and the corresponding arithmetic, <b>EBA</b> shows similarities to <b>HA</b>.</p>
<p><b>Mathematics Subject Classification:</b> Primary 03F30; secondary 03F50.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ardeshir, M., Hesaam, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Introduction to Basic Arithmetic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>13</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Congruences on Dynamic Algebras]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The lattice <I>Cong</I><f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f> of all dynamic congruences on a given dynamic algebra <f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f> is presented. Whenever <f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f> is separable with zero we define dynamic ideal on <f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f>, given rise to the lattice <I>Ide</I><f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f>. The notions of kernel of a dynamic congruence and the congruence generated by a dynamic ideal are introduced to describe a Galois connection between <I>Cong</I><f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f> and <I>Ide</I><f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f>. We study conditions under which a dynamic congruence is determined by its kernel.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinto, S. M., Oliveira-Martins, T., Pinto, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Congruences on Dynamic Algebras]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Basic Constructive Logic for a Weak Sense of Consistency defined with a Propositional Falsity Constant]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The logic B<SUB>Kc1</SUB> is the basic constructive logic in the ternary relational semantics (without a set of designated points) adequate to consistency understood as the absence of the negation of any theorem. Negation is introduced in B<SUB>Kc1</SUB> with a negation connective. The aim of this paper is to define the logic B<SUB>Kc1<I>F</I></SUB>. In this logic negation is introduced via a propositional falsity constant. We prove that B<SUB>Kc1</SUB> and B<SUB>Kc1<I>F</I></SUB> are definitionally equivalent.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robles, G., Mendez, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Basic Constructive Logic for a Weak Sense of Consistency defined with a Propositional Falsity Constant]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/43?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Term Definable Classes of Boolean Functions and Frame Definability in Modal Logic]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/43?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We establish a connection between term definability of Boolean functions and definability of finite modal frames. We introduce a bijective translation between functional terms and uniform degree-1 formulas and show that a class of Boolean functions is defined by functional terms if and only if the corresponding class of Scott-Montague frames is defined by the translations of these functional terms, and vice versa. As a special case, we get that the clone <SUB>1</SUB> of all conjunctions corresponds to the class of all Kripke frames. We also characterize some classes of Scott-Montague frames corresponding to subclones of <SUB>1</SUB> by restricting the class of Kripke frames in a natural way. Furthermore, by modifying Kripke semantics, we extend our results to correspondences between linear clones and classes of Kripke frames equipped with modified semantics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Couceiro, M., Hella, L., Kivela, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Term Definable Classes of Boolean Functions and Frame Definability in Modal Logic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ternary Exclusive Or]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Ternary exclusive <I>or</I> is the (two valued) truth function that is true just in case exactly one of its three arguments is true. This is an interesting truth function, not definable in terms of the binary exclusive <I>or</I> alone, although the binary case is definable in terms of the ternary case. This article investigates the types of truth functions that can be defined by ternary exclusive <I>or</I>, and relates these findings to the seminal work of Emil Post.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelletier, F. J., Hartline, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ternary Exclusive Or]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maximum Entropy Inference with Quantified Knowledge]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate uncertain reasoning with quantified sentences of the predicate calculus treated as the limiting case of maximum entropy inference applied to finite domains.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barnett, O., Paris, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maximum Entropy Inference with Quantified Knowledge]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Application of Model Theory to Semimodules]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this note, we prove that the theory <I>T</I> of cancellative semimodules over a semiring <I>R</I> has the amalgamation property. If <I>R</I> is an entire cancellative zerosumfree semiring, then <I>T</I> has no model-companion. In particular, the theory of commutative additively cancellative monoids forms an example of a non-companionable theory.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zayed, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Application of Model Theory to Semimodules]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/16/1/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzn001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Acknowledgements</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foreword]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foreword]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>371</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Foreword</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/373?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Inductive Theorem on the Correctness of General Recursive Programs]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/373?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We prove a relatively simple inductive theorem (analogous to Floyd and Dijkstra's Invariance Theorem for iterative programs) to verify the correctness of an ample class of non-deterministic general recursive programs. This result is based on Hoare and Jifeng's relational semantics. By considering the structure of its code and specification, we propose <I>regularity conditions</I> on the predicate transformer associated to the fixed-point equation of a general (non deterministic) recursive program to prove it correct by induction on a well founded ordering of a covering of the domain of its corresponding input-output relation. All fixed point solutions associated to a predicate transformer satisfying these regularity conditions coincide when restricted to the domain of its least fixed point solution. We find these conditions non unduly restrictive, since continuous operators defining deterministic programs as their corresponding least fixed-point solutions must fulfill them. We couch deterministic programs (viewed as least solutions of fixed-point equations) in a restriction of Hoare and Jifeng's <f>$$\mathcal{P}$$</f> programming language of (partial) finitary relations into the greatest  solutions of fixed-point equations expressed in terms of "total finitary" relations of an adequate restriction of their <f>$$\mathcal{D}$$</f> language</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bohorquez, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Inductive Theorem on the Correctness of General Recursive Programs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>399</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>373</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/401?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Rules of Logic Composition for the Bayesian Epistemic e-Values]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/401?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this paper, the relationship between the <I>e</I>-value of a complex hypothesis, <I>H</I>, and those of its constituent elementary hypotheses, <I>H<sup>j</sup></I>, <I>j</I> = 1... <I>k</I>, is analyzed, in the independent setup.  The <I>e</I>-value of a hypothesis <I>H</I>, ev(<I>H</I>), is a Bayesian epistemic, credibility or truth value defined under the Full Bayesian Significance Testing (FBST) mathematical apparatus. The questions addressed concern the important issue of how the truth value of <I>H</I>, and the truth function of the corresponding FBST structure <I>M</I>, relate to the truth values of its elementary constituents, <I>H<sup>j</sup></I>, and to the truth functions of their corresponding FBST structures <I>M<sup>j</sup></I>, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borges, W., Stern, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Rules of Logic Composition for the Bayesian Epistemic e-Values]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>420</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>401</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Logical and Philosophical Remarks on Quasi-Set Theory]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Quasi-set theory is a theory for dealing with collections of indistinguishable objects. In this paper we discuss some logical and philosophical questions involved with such a theory. The analysis of these questions enable us to provide the first grounds of a possible new view of physical reality, founded on an ontology of non-individuals, to which quasi-set theory may constitute the logical basis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da Costa, N. C. A., Krause, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Logical and Philosophical Remarks on Quasi-Set Theory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>431</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/433?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Large Cardinals and Topology: a Short Retrospective and Some New Results]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/433?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper is an enlarged version of the short talk delivered at XIV Brazilian Logic Conference (XIV EBL 2006, Itatiaia, Rio de Janeiro). The author's purpose is to present some applications of large cardinals in general topology, pointing out that there are several topological problems that cannot be settled without dealing with  inaccessible cardinals. Various "classical examples" are mentioned, together with recent results. In the last section a  new result is presented: it is shown that the existence of a separable space  with an uncountable closed discrete subset satisfying a certain relative version of countable paracompactness implies the existence of inner models with measurable cardinals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da Silva, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Large Cardinals and Topology: a Short Retrospective and Some New Results]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>443</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>433</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fast-Growing Functions and the P vs. NP Question]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Out of a folklore&ndash;like fact about the counterexample function to <I>P=NP</I>, a function which grows about as fast as the Busy Beaver function, we review the consequences of our (with da Costa) exotic formalization for <I>P=NP</I> and then speculate about possible ways to extend our work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doria, F. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fast-Growing Functions and the P vs. NP Question]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>455</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using the Internal Logic of a Topos to Model Search Spaces for Problems]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We present a structural model for (meta)heuristic search strategies for solving computational problems. The model is defined through the use of topos-theoretical tools and techniques, which provide an appropriate internal logic (with the language of local set theory) where objects of interest can be represented.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[do Amaral, F. N., Haeusler, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using the Internal Logic of a Topos to Model Search Spaces for Problems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>474</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fibring in the Leibniz Hierarchy]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article studies preservation of certain algebraic properties of propositional logics when combined by fibring. The logics analyzed here are classified in protoalgebraic, equivalential and algebraizable. By introducing new categories of algebrizable logics and of deductivizable quasi-varieties, it is stated an isomorphism between these categories. This constitutes an alternative to a similar result found in the literature.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez, V. L., Coniglio, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fibring in the Leibniz Hierarchy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>501</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/503?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Minimal Models]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/503?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigate some logics which use the concept of minimal models in their definition. Minimal objects are widely used in Logic and Computer Science. They are applied in the context of Inductive Definitions, Logic Programming and Artificial Intelligence. An example of logic which uses this concept is the MIN(FO) logic due to van Benthem [20]. He shows that MIN(FO) is equivalent to the Least Fixed Point logic (LFP) in expressive power. In [6], we extended MIN(FO) to the MIN Logic and proved it is equivalent to second-order logic in expressive power. Here, we exhibit a fragment of MIN, the MIN<SUB></SUB> logic, which is more expressive than LFP, less expressive than MIN and closed under boolean connectives and first-order quantification. In order to do this, in the Section 2, we prove that the Downward L&ouml;wenheim-Skolem Theorem holds for arbitrary countable sets of LFP-formulas by showing that every infinite structure has a countable LFP-substructure. The method may be used to generalize this theorem to any set of LFP-formulas. We also analyse the expressive power of the Nested Abnormality Theories (NATs) of Lifschitz, another formalism based on minimal models used in Artificial Intelligence, and we demonstrate that for each second-order theory  there is a NAT which is a conservative extension of . We give a translation from second-order sentences into such NATs which is linear in the size of the sentence in prenex normal form. Finally, we establish a hierarchy of expressiveness of these logics that deal with the concept of minimal models.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferreira, F. M., Martins, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Minimal Models]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>503</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pure Hilbert Algebras with Infimum]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In [6], <I>iH</I>-algebras were introduced in order to indicate an equational version of the class of Hilbert algebras where each pair of elements has infimum. These authors also proved that this variety has the class of Curry's implicative semilattices ([9]) as a proper subvariety. On the other hand, in [4] a special class of Hilbert algebras associated with ordered sets, which they called order algebras, were investigated. These algebras were also studied in [1] under the name of pure Hilbert algebras.</p>
<p>Bearing in mind the above results, in this paper we introduce the notion of  pure Hilbert algebras with infimum (or <I>ipH</I>-algebras, for short). Furthermore, we characterize the lattice of <I>ipH</I>-congruences and we determine the subdirectly irreducible <I>ipH</I>-algebras. Besides, we prove that subdirectly irreducible <I>ipH</I>-algebras are also subdirectly irreducible <I>iH</I>-algebras.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figallo, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pure Hilbert Algebras with Infimum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>533</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/535?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Monadic Distributive Lattices]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/535?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the variety of algebras, which we call monadic distributive lattices, as a natural generalization of monadic Heyting algebras [16]. It is worth mentioning that the latter is a proper subvariety of the first one, as it is shown in a simple example. Our main interest is the characterization of simple and subdirectly irreducible monadic distributive lattices. In order to do this, a duality theory for these algebras is developed. The duality enables us to describe the lattice of congruences on monadic distributive lattices. Finally, our attention is focused upon the relationship between the category of dual spaces associatted with these algebras and the category of perfect Ono frames considered by Bezhanishvili in order to represent monadic Heyting algebras.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figallo, A. V., Pascual, I., Ziliani, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Monadic Distributive Lattices]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>535</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equal Rights for the Cut: Computable Non-analytic Cuts in Cut-based Proofs]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This work studies the structure of proofs containing non-analytic cuts in the cut-based system, a sequent inference system in which the cut rule is not eliminable and the only branching rule is the cut. Such sequent system is invertible, leading to the KE-tableau decision method. We study the structure of such proofs, proving the existence of a normal form for them in the form of a comb-tree proof.</p>
<p>We then concentrate on the problem of efficiently computing non-analytic cuts. For that, we study the generalisation of techniques present in many modern theorem provers, namely the techniques of conflict-driven formula learning.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finger, M., Gabbay, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equal Rights for the Cut: Computable Non-analytic Cuts in Cut-based Proofs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>575</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/577?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Positive Relational Calculi]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/577?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We discuss the question of inclusions between positive relational terms and some of its aspects, using the form of a dialogue. Two possible approaches to the problem are emphasized: natural deduction and graph manipulations. Both provide sound and complete calculi for proving the valid inclusions, supporting nice strategies to obtain proofs in normal form, but the latter appears to present several advantages, which are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Freitas, R., Veloso, P. A.S., Veloso, S. R.M., Viana, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Positive Relational Calculi]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>577</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Language and Logical Pluralism: Some Aspects of a Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Nature of Logic]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This essay examines the importance of some aspects of Wittgenstein's post-<I>Tractatus</I> work in the realm of discussions on the nature of logic. The first part considers a relationship between certain conceptions of language and certain positions on the nature of logical laws and logical pluralism. Supposing the rejection of mentalism in the field of meaning leads to a rejection of psychologism, it presents some alternatives different from psychologism, based on non mentalistic theories of meaning. One is the Platonistic Fregean approach to language and logic, the other is Carnap's formalist view on both topics.  The second part concentrates on Wittgenstein's non mentalistic and non Platonistic proposals about language and his defense of the logical pluralism proposed by psychologists. It compares two periods on Wittgenstein's work after <I>Tractatus</I> -the periods of &lsquo;calculus conception&rsquo; and &lsquo;languange games conception&rsquo;- and it shows how characteristic notions of Wittgenstein's later conception of language, like &lsquo;use&rsquo;, &lsquo;language games&rsquo;, and &lsquo;forms of life&rsquo;, work on the characterization of logic and specially on the kind of logical pluralism that the author seems to defend in his last period. In doing so, this essay offers an approach to some of the author's considerations about contradictions and the possibility of the existence of a calculus that includes them. This approach emphasizes on the idea of applicability (or use of a linguistic expression) introduced by the author in some of his last works, and in some examples of functional contradictions that can help to understand and complement that idea.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Language and Logical Pluralism: Some Aspects of a Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Nature of Logic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>619</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/621?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why and How Platonism?]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/621?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Probably the best arguments for Platonism are those directed against its rival philosophies of mathematics. Frege's arguments against formalism, G&ouml;del's arguments against constructivism and those against the so-called syntactic view of mathematics, and an argument of Hodges against Putnam are expounded, as well as some arguments of the author. A more general criticism of Quine's views follows. The paper ends with some thoughts on mathematics as a sort of Platonism of structures, as conceived by Husserl and essentially endorsed by the author.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosado Haddock, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why and How Platonism?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>636</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>621</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/637?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Extensions of Elementary Submodels by Forcing]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/637?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We study when a partial order <f>$$\mathbb{P}$$</f> preserves certain properties of an elementary submodel (of a structure of the form <I>H</I><SUB></SUB>), including countable closure and -covering. In particular, we discuss the existence of -covering elementary submodels of different sizes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junqueira, L. R., Larson, P., Passos, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Extensions of Elementary Submodels by Forcing]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>651</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>637</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Games on Trees and Syntactical Complexity of Formulas]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Ehrenfeucht-Fra&iuml;ss&eacute; games have been introduced as a means of characterizing the relation of <I>elementary equivalence</I> between structures, or relational database instances in first order logic (<I>FO</I>), or equivalently Relational Calculus. In~the usual Ehrenfeucht-Fra&iuml;ss&eacute; games the rules are determined by a linear ordering of a fixed lenght or, equivalently, by a special kind of tree &ndash; a chain of a fixed length &ndash;, where each point of that ordering or node of that tree corresponds to a quantification operation. Here we consider Ehrenfeucht-Fra&iuml;ss&eacute; games whose rules are determined by <I>arbitrary trees</I> such that their nodes correspond either to quantification operations ("q&ndash;nodes") or to connective operations ("c&ndash;nodes"). By playing games on trees, we can refine the class of sentences which are considered in a given game, since a tree represents a particular class of sentences. We define and study several variations of tree games, for first and second order logic (<I>SO</I>). We give a sufficient condition for <I>FO</I> and <I>SO</I> equivalence restricted to formulae with up to <I>n</I> connectives, and hence also a sufficient condition for the non expressibility of a given query in those logics with formulae whose number of logical connectives is <I>less than</I> a given integer. We also give a sufficient condition to prove simultaneous lower bounds in both the number of connectives and in the quantifier types needed to express a given property in <I>FO</I>. If we consider only quantifier types, we get a characterization of the relation of preservation of sentences in the fragment of <I>FO</I> with the given set of quantifier types. We also study tree games for <I><SUB>n</SUB></I> and <I><SUB>n</SUB></I> formulae. To illustrate the use of our games we use them to prove lower bounds in the connective size for several <I>FO</I> queries, like <I>size of a database, size of a clique in a graph, size of a unary relation, transitive property in a graph, and degree of a node in a graph.</I> Regarding <I>SO</I>, we prove lower bounds for quantifier rank for the parity query.</p>
<p>Finally, we give a precise characterization of the logic whose elementary equivalence is characterized by a given tree game, as well as several equivalent characterizations of the existence of a winning strategy for Duplicator in the classical Ehrenfeucht-Fra&iuml;ss&eacute; game.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krynicki, M., Torres, J. M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Games on Trees and Syntactical Complexity of Formulas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>687</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/689?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Logic of Classes]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/689?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An extension of the Quantified Propositional Calculus<sup>1</sup> obtained by the addition of two binary propositional functions is put forward as an inheritor of E. Schr&ouml;der's "<I>Algebra der Logik</I>". The formal system is itself not new, in fact it forms part of A. P. Morse's "<I>A Theory of Sets</I>"; although the latter is considered as a first-order system (of a rather non-standard type).</p>
<p>Since the additional  propositional functions are not invariant under the logical biconditional, this system&ndash;and many others naturally obtained from it&ndash;give us a collection of  examples of non-standard, but mathematically meaningful, propositional systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez-Escobar, E. G. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Logic of Classes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>706</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>689</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/707?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fibred and Indexed Categories for Abstract Model Theory]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/707?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Indexed and Fibred category theory have a long tradition in computer science as a language to formalize different presentations of the notion of a logic, as for instance, in the theory of institutions and general logics, and as unifying models of (categorical) logic and type theory as well. Here we introduce the notions of indexed and fibred frames and construct a rich mathematical workspace where many relevant and useful concepts of logics can be elegantly modelled. To demonstrate the applicability of these tools, essential ideas around the theory of institutions are recasted and described.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martini, A., Wolter, U., Haeusler, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fibred and Indexed Categories for Abstract Model Theory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>739</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>707</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Restricted Classical Modal Logics]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We consider a family of noncongruential modal logics obtained by restricting the smallest classical modal logic <b>E</b> and some of its extensions. We show that these logics are also properly contained in Lemmon's <b>S0.5</b>; semantics for them are adapted from Cresswell's semantics for <b>S0.5</b> and from neighborhood semantics for classical modal logics. Some extensions of these logics by means of usual modal logical axioms are also considered, and determination results proved. As a further example, we also show how to obtain restricted versions of some of Chellas and Segerberg's prenormal modal logics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mortari, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Restricted Classical Modal Logics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>757</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/759?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Criteria of Identity and their Logical Form]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/759?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The goal of this paper is to wonder whether there is some pattern preserved throughout every criterion of identity. Two solutions will be examined: Leibniz's Law and Lowe's criterion of identity. In particular, it will be defended the following theses about them: <l type="ord"><li><p>they are circular definitions;</p>
</li><li>
<p>their circularity, by itself, does not make them untenable accounts.</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedroso, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Criteria of Identity and their Logical Form]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>765</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>759</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/767?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Note on Gentzen's LJ and NJ Systems Isomorphism]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/767?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this paper we are going to examine intuitionistic sequent calculus and its negation rules. We state new negation rules defining, in this way, a new sequent system. It will be used to clarify Gentzen's <I>NJ</I> and <I>LJ</I> systems isomorphism. These new negation rules are a direct reading of new natural deduction negation rules obtained by a slight modification of <I>NJ</I> rules. We also show that the new system is equivalent to <I>LJ</I> and that the <I>Hauptsatz</I> holds for it.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Campos Sanz, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Note on Gentzen's LJ and NJ Systems Isomorphism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>774</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>767</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Natural Deduction for 'Generally']]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Logics for &lsquo;generally&rsquo; (LG&rsquo;s) were introduced for handling assertions with vague notions (e.g. &lsquo;generally&rsquo;, &lsquo;most&rsquo;, &lsquo;several&rsquo;), which occur often in ordinary language and in science. LG&rsquo;s provide a framework for distinct notions of &lsquo;generally&rsquo;: one builds a specific logic for the notion one has in mind. We introduce deductive systems, in natural deduction style, for LG&rsquo;s and show that these systems are normalizable.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vana, L. B., Veloso, P. A. S., Veloso, S. R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Natural Deduction for 'Generally']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>800</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/801?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://jigpal.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/5-6/801?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzm050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5-6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>801</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>801</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Acknowledgements</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>